|
05 April 2010 ,
Written by Dhruv Tanwar
|
|
RSA, The Security Division of EMC and Microsoft have announced the results of a commissioned global survey conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of RSA and Microsoft, entitled “The Value of Corporate Secrets: How Compliance and Collaboration Affect Enterprise Perceptions of Risk.”
The survey of 305 IT security decision-makers worldwide reveals that enterprises are investing heavily in compliance and protection against accidental leaks of custodial data (such as customer information), but under-investing in protection against theft of far more valuable trade secrets.
Security spending mis-aligned with information value
The study reveals that almost 90% of enterprises surveyed agreed that compliance with PCI-DSS, data privacy laws, data breach regulations, and existing data security policies is the primary driver of their data security programs. It found that significant percentages of enterprise budgets (39%) are devoted to compliance-related data security programs, but secrets comprise 62% of the overall information portfolio’s total value while compliance-related custodial data comprises just 38%, a much smaller proportion. According to the study, this strongly suggests that investments are “overweighed toward compliance.”
Sam Curry, CTO, Marketing, RSA, The Security Division of EMC says “Companies are spending money to protect customer, medical and payment card information, as they should, but more emphasis needs to be placed on protecting the intellectual property and data that has intrinsic value to an organization.” He says lost IP can cause long term competitive harm to an organization, pointing to the recent highly-sophisticated attacks targeting intellectual property of large multinational companies that are “examples of this type of loss.”
Information theft more costly than accidental loss
The survey revealed that though organizations focus on data security incidents related to accidental loss, information theft by employees or trusted outsiders is more costly. For example, employee theft of sensitive information is ten times costlier than accidental loss on a per-incident basis – the equivalent of hundreds of thousands of dollars versus tens of thousands.
John Chirapurath, senior director of the Identity and Security Business Group at Microsoft says insider risk is a real and growing threat and the modern enterprise environment of collaboration with a variety of outside parties creates more opportunities for leakage and theft. “This data illustrates that the more a company has to lose in terms of information value, the more criminal activity it will face.”
“Most enterprises do not actually know whether their data security programs work or not, other than by raw incident counting,” according to Forrester Consulting. “‘Compliance’ in all its forms has helped CISOs buy more gear. But it has distracted IT security from its traditional focus: keeping company secrets secure.”
Together, the trio of Forrester, Microsoft and RSA recommend the following to help enterprises ensure that their information security strategies are appropriately balanced:
- Identify the most valuable information assets in the company’s portfolio
- Create a “risk register” of data security risks that documents specific threat scenarios
- Assess and reprioritize the IT security program’s balance between compliance and protecting secrets
- Increase vigilance of external and third-party business relationships
- Measure data security program effectiveness.
|